-
@Sen nuh uh what. You disagree or you have proof ?
-
@Snazzy-Boba nuh uh.
-
@Snazzy-Boba I dont know what you mean by us ânot having proof.â He has literallyâŚadmittedâŚhe was doing trolling on this forum. Knowing that, itâs not weird of us to âturn on him so quicklyâ
-
If soliciting 13 year olds for erotic roleplay, sending and requesting nudes, and on call roleplaying isnât proof for you then idk what is
-
@Duchess again, i was told a pedo was posing as him. So just maybe whoever âadmittedâ he was trolling was not really laws.
-
And thatâs before he was banned
-
@Thetruepath i understand, well it looks like I was not told the entire truth. Thank you for your time.
-
@Snazzy-Boba no problem
-
@Snazzy-Boba Here, Iâll just give you some proof that the pedo Lavendar is NOT the person getting people to turn on him. He told me he knows who they are and heâs on their side (personal opinion, I think itâs just himself, but anyways)
-
dis shi stupid as fuđ´
-
Angel Ong tho
-
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
-
@Duchess same
-
@Duchess thank you and now I will be talking to him about what I just been told and saw.
-
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and Iâll get some more shit for ya if youâre not banned by then
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
Understandable
-
@Duchess Ong
-
@Snazzy-Boba stfu u got none to say u iz laws
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and Iâll get some more shit for ya if youâre not banned by then
Well shit đđ getting banned for this would be wild
-
@Snazzy-Boba safety problems here. Weâve seen a lot of dumb shit here
