-
@Duchess thank you and now I will be talking to him about what I just been told and saw.
-
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and I’ll get some more shit for ya if you’re not banned by then
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
Understandable
-
@Duchess Ong
-
@Snazzy-Boba stfu u got none to say u iz laws
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and I’ll get some more shit for ya if you’re not banned by then
Well shit 😭😂 getting banned for this would be wild
-
@Snazzy-Boba safety problems here. We’ve seen a lot of dumb shit here
-
Angel I can 100% say I am not laws. And I can prove it
-
@Snazzy-Boba mind if I check that IP 👺👹
-
@Thetruepath check tha shi bru ong
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba safety problems here. We’ve seen a lot of dumb shit here
I get it. Anyways I’d love to see the proof it would give me more to go off of when I speak with laws
-
Bruh laws really gets me going😋👄
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba mind if I check that IP 👺👹
Ummm that’s just fantastic 😭
-
-
-
@Snazzy-Boba Laws said he could prove the “imposter” wasn’t him but proceeded to not prove jack. AND said he was on their side
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba Laws said he could prove the “imposter” wasn’t him but proceeded to not prove jack. AND said he was on their side
That’s wild. I’m genuinely confused
-
@Izzy said in To whom it may be concerned:
Bruh laws really gets me going😋👄
Going where? Hell? Because that’s the only place I can think of.
-
@Duchess duchess 😭😭😭
-
@Izzy