-
@Snazzy-Boba thanks for this new possibility to think about
-
kitkatgirlie ur welcome
-
@Sen nuh uh what. You disagree or you have proof ?
-
@Snazzy-Boba nuh uh.
-
@Snazzy-Boba I dont know what you mean by us “not having proof.” He has literally…admitted…he was doing trolling on this forum. Knowing that, it’s not weird of us to “turn on him so quickly”
-
If soliciting 13 year olds for erotic roleplay, sending and requesting nudes, and on call roleplaying isn’t proof for you then idk what is
-
@Duchess again, i was told a pedo was posing as him. So just maybe whoever “admitted” he was trolling was not really laws.
-
And that’s before he was banned
-
@Thetruepath i understand, well it looks like I was not told the entire truth. Thank you for your time.
-
@Snazzy-Boba no problem
-
@Snazzy-Boba Here, I’ll just give you some proof that the pedo Lavendar is NOT the person getting people to turn on him. He told me he knows who they are and he’s on their side (personal opinion, I think it’s just himself, but anyways)
-
dis shi stupid as fu😴
-
Angel Ong tho
-
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
-
@Duchess same
-
@Duchess thank you and now I will be talking to him about what I just been told and saw.
-
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and I’ll get some more shit for ya if you’re not banned by then
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
Understandable
-
@Duchess Ong
-
@Snazzy-Boba stfu u got none to say u iz laws
