CHANGE MY MIND.
-
JDP_Random well yes I agree with that
I think Ai “Artists” shouldn’t be given the title artists at all because all they do is type a prompt like for example, Fluffy dog.
And you’d get something like these.
They pose it, And they get the credit for “Talent”
-
@ゼフィラ-ヤラ Oh definitely.
That’s like 1 percent credit to the human, 99 percent to the ai.
it’s like telling another person what to draw and they do it for you but in this case it’s a computer.
in this case the human is telling the ai what to do and the ai runs the numbers and puts out a image.
so in this case it’s definitely not art for the human but the ai. -
Oh and I would also say an Ai artist is more of a “creative writer” than an “artist”
Random occurs everywhere…
-
JDP_Random even then its not that creative
-
JDP_Random You don’t even need to type full sntences to make AI “Art”
Just type Robot painting And you get this
Real
AI
-
@ゼフィラ-ヤラ aight nevermind about creative writing. I guess they get the title of “prompt giver” or somethin i don’t even know at this point 💀
Random occurs everywhere…
-
JDP_Random prompt jockey
-
JDP_Random 💀💀
-
@ゼフィラ-ヤラ I will not change your mind because you’re spitting fax
-
i’d disagree to some extent
AI art is still art [ at least to me ], since it was technically made the same way humans make art, just instead of a human it’s artificial intelligencebut I do agree with this :
I think Ai “Artists” shouldn’t be given the title artists at all because all they do is type a prompt like for example, Fluffy dog.
yes, AI generated art definitely does not make one an « artist »
-
@ゼフィラ-ヤラ I agree. But it becomes art when it’s used to make funny pictures LOL
-
AI art is art, as the name says.
What’s not okay: you cannot perceive yourself as an artist just because you inserted a prompt in an Ai art tool and not having made said prompt yourself.
Since AI art may contain intricate detailing that are impossible for human artists to replicate, it’s easy to tell whenever someone used or not artificial intelligence tools.
