Need moderators
-
@Addielyn-rose-afton are you 16
-
@アストルフォ sadly no. But I can offer more than 16 year olds.
-
@Addielyn-rose-afton ok yoy cant be a mpp mod but a mppc mod :]
-
@アストルフォ Soo…can I be a mppc mod!?
-
@Addielyn-rose-afton yes probably
-
admin
Applying r n . -
System referenced this topic on
-
@Your-Local-Non-Binary-Kiddo I still wanted to make a statement, yknow? I don’t think admin guy knew too much about me lol
-
@Duchess So you don’t wanna be on the list ? I think you would do great
-
@Your-Local-Non-Binary-Kiddo I am honored to even be considered : ) I’ll be happy with whoever is chosen though. I trust you guys.
-
Hi hello, I am indeed here to apply for moderator
-
admin i would be good at one
-
i would also like to be moderator im on mpp everyday unless im at school
-
wasn’t the pre-req for moderators like 16+ or something
-
@DREAMY also people that are brutally honest and get into drama frequently (a.k.a the majority of roleplay room members) shouldn’t be mods- just my opinion of course- people get mad fast and bans just from the room tend to be unnecessary (no offense) so being moderator could make that worse
-
@DREAMY MPP Moderation, Yes. MPPCommunity is… Different.
-
@The-Missing-Eye not at all same issues and more drama
-
No, I meant the age requirements.
-
@The-Missing-Eye ah ok
-
admin said in Need moderators:
Ideally we should have moderators that are active members of the community who know people and know what’s going on so they can resolve disputes and flaming by talking to people rather than just banning whoever gets reported, as the administrators do not have the time nor insight to provide the optimal moderation experience. If you think you have what it takes to make this forum a better place for everyone, apply here.
According to this logic, this proves that @Nitsua should not be banning in the ways that they have been. They’ve (from my perspective, always) banned the person (Knox is a good example) simply after reviewing reported posts. By the time Knox got banned, she’d, as far as I can see, had only broken the guidelines DAYS before her ban-time started. She was banned in the first place for telling people to “kill themselves.” But, after her ban-time ended, she never did anything like what she did again and probably never will. This could’ve all been solved in the first place, though, if a moderator just talked with her. Oh, and by the way, she claims to be 11 years old. She would’ve probably listened if a moderator had a conversation with her about what happened rather than a mod simply banning her without warning.
I know Knox’s online presence and personality quite well, in case you didn’t know already.
My point?
If you’re a moderator, please, please talk with the suspect first before banning them. In my mind it would make the community at least somewhat of a less toxic and more stable place.
Thank you for reading. -
@Laws
- I already explained my reasoning and reasons why talking to the “suspect” isn’t always needed/applicable.
- There are more admins/moderators than just me
- You can’t see who banned who
- With your logic if a person committed a crime, let’s say, a pedophile, me banning them multiple days later after the “incidents” is unjustified
