-
@Duchess same
-
@Duchess thank you and now I will be talking to him about what I just been told and saw.
-
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and Iâll get some more shit for ya if youâre not banned by then
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
Honestly, anyone who is on his side just looks like another Laws account to me
Understandable
-
@Duchess Ong
-
@Snazzy-Boba stfu u got none to say u iz laws
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba DM me and Iâll get some more shit for ya if youâre not banned by then
Well shit đđ getting banned for this would be wild
-
@Snazzy-Boba safety problems here. Weâve seen a lot of dumb shit here
-
Angel I can 100% say I am not laws. And I can prove it
-
@Snazzy-Boba mind if I check that IP đșđč
-
@Thetruepath check tha shi bru ong
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba safety problems here. Weâve seen a lot of dumb shit here
I get it. Anyways Iâd love to see the proof it would give me more to go off of when I speak with laws
-
Bruh laws really gets me goingđđ
-
@Thetruepath said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba mind if I check that IP đșđč
Ummm thatâs just fantastic đ
-
-
-
@Snazzy-Boba Laws said he could prove the âimposterâ wasnât him but proceeded to not prove jack. AND said he was on their side
-
@Duchess said in To whom it may be concerned:
@Snazzy-Boba Laws said he could prove the âimposterâ wasnât him but proceeded to not prove jack. AND said he was on their side
Thatâs wild. Iâm genuinely confused
-
@Izzy said in To whom it may be concerned:
Bruh laws really gets me goingđđ
Going where? Hell? Because thatâs the only place I can think of.
-
@Duchess duchess đđđ
