wrong answers only

[finn.in.outer.space.]

The FitnessGram™ Pacer Test is a multistage aerobic capacity test that progressively gets more difficult as it continues. The 20 meter pacer test will begin in 30 seconds. Line up at the start. The running speed starts slowly, but gets faster each minute after you hear this signal. [beep] A single lap should be completed each time you hear this sound. [ding] Remember to run in a straight line, and run as long as possible. The second time you fail to complete a lap before the sound, your test is over. The test will begin on the word start. On your mark, get ready, start.

[ɪɴꜰɪɴᴀ-ᴘʜᴏᴇɴɪx]

Fish. Reason? AHEM. You. Me. Gas station. What are we getting for dinner? Sushi of course. Uh oh! There was a roofie in our gas station sushi. We black out and wake up in a sewer surrounded by fish!!! Horny fish!!! You know what that means…! Fish orgy! The stench draws in a bear. What do we do? We’re gonna fight it! Bear fight. Bare handed. Bare, naked? Oh, yes please. We befriend the bear after we beat it in a brawl and ride it into a Chuck E. Cheese. Dance Dance Revolution. Revolution? Overthrow the government? Uh, I think so!@!@!@!@!@! Next thing you know, I’m reincarnated as Jesus Christ!! Then I turn into a jet, fly into the sun, black out again, wake up, do a bump, white out, which I didn’t even know you could do. Then I smoked a joint, greened out!! Then I turn into the sun. Uh oh! Looks like the meth is kicking in. aklfhaofhasfahfakh AAAAAAAAA afahfioahflkf AAAAA

[A Former User]

@finneass Eww flashbacks

[A Former User]

1+1=3

you see…

when a man loves a woman they hit the griddy, perform a satanic ritual and summon a demon spawn known as: infant

[A Former User]

Flip Ditcher 1 + 1 = 492374 bacause Since the beginning of humankind, we have been inventing terms to use in our various dialects to explain complex concepts and ideas. One such concept is numerical addition. This concept has had a profound impact on humanity in all parts of the world, as it has highly assisted trading, business, farming, building, and especially with precision and accuracy, to the extent where some industries are solely based on the principles of mathematics. Mathematics is a language in itself, and it can be used to calculate, or to be specific to this question, ‘solve’, one in addition to one.

In the language of mathematics, one is a number representing a single object. One of the beauties of mathematics (or ‘maths’ in its simplified form, with the word ‘simplified’ of course being an allusion to the mathematical process of simplification) is that these numbers can be applied to any entity, such as an apple, dog, or human being, or even to theoretical constructs such as atoms, words, or thoughts. Ignoring these possibilities and seeing ‘one’ as an object (an action we should not perform on carbon-based lifeforms in our society, specifically women, in judgement toward the general political standpoint of our world today), we can see that when possessing another object, the total number of objects will theoretically increase. In mathematics, an increase in a number ‘shifts’ the value of the number across one place to the right, in relation to the following list:

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

Therefore, by converting the term ‘one’ to its numerical form ‘1’, we can see that the next place across from ‘1’ in this list inhabits the digit of ‘2’, or ‘two’ in phonetic form. Thus, the answer, or ‘solution’ to this question must correspondingly be ‘2’.
The English language happens to include several links to this particular equation, as it is used so frequently and commonly in everyday life. Such connections can be found in words such as ‘twice’, ‘twin’, ‘couple’, ‘pair’, and ‘double’, all exhibiting connotations related to the concept of ‘two’. In this way, these two fundamentally different languages have found a common ground, one that proves the logic behind both ways of analysing the information in our world.

Although the steps to solving such a conundrum are highly advanced, the working out can be expressed in a very simplistic fashion:

1 + 1 = 2

To conclude, I would be inclined to quote the famous mathematician Big Shaq in his statement of the following:

“Two in addition to two is equal to four; subtract one and the solution is three; mathematics at a substantial pace.”

This highly complex yet fundamental mathematical theory can be proven through the equation:

( 2 + 2 ) - 1 = 3

[Soggy_Bread]

Flip Ditcher One plus one equals five and I’m the love of your life. Cause if rain don’t pour the sun don’t shine, then changing you was possible. No love is never logical

-Olivia rodrigo, Logical, GUTS

[Flip Ditcher]

@Winnie_the_Bitchless yap session

[Lorak]

1+1=To

As in “to” Baby Shark roll.

[A Former User]

Flip Ditcher it was a random copypasta i found

[A Former User]

1+1 = -2 This starts by taking 1+1 right? Then we rewrite it as sqrt(1)+sqrt(1) Then we rewrite that as sqrt((-1)*(-1))+sqrt((-1)*(-1)) Which we can rewrite as sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)+sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) Since sqrt(-1) is the imaginary number i, we get i*i+i*i Which is i²+i² But i² = -1 So substituting that in, we get -1-1 = -2 So we have proven that 1+1 = -2!!!!
Edit: Oh and that 1 = -1, can’t forget that

[A Former User]

Flip Ditcher 2.

[Bandit]

@A38 I never thought I’d ever have to see the imaginary substitute “i” outside of math class for a damn joke

[A Former User]

𝓑𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓽 i mean…